¸ñÀû: Understanding the anatomy of paranasal sinuses and their variations is
essential to a safe and effective endoscopic sinus surgery.
Ethmomaxillary sinus (EMS) is a relatively rare paranasal sinus
anatomic variation. The aim of this study was to investigate the
clinical significance and the imaging anatomical characteristics of
the EMS. In addition, we investigated the differences between the EMS
and Haller cell. ¹æ¹ý:We conducted a retrospective analysis of PNS CT scans that were obtained
between April 2020 to December 2020 in Rhinologic Clinic at Guro
Hospital. PNS CT scans (SOMATOM Definition AS Plus, Siemens, Germany)
were obtained at 1 mm-section thickness. The prevalence and general
characters of the EMS, co-existing anatomical variations and
relationship with paranasal sinusitis were investigated. Two examiners
independently analyzed the PNS CT images with the OnDemand3D software
program (Cybermed, Seoul, South Korea) to measure the volume of
maxillary sinuses. We compared these findings with those of Haller
cells. °á°ú:EMS was present in 26 patients of the 250 patients (10.4%). The male to
female ratio was the same. Their ages ranged between 18 and 83 years
(mean age, 49.4). The EMS was bilateral in 34.6% and unilateral in
65.4%. The prevalence of Haller cells was similar to that of EMS
(10.8%). Maxillary sinus hypoplasia was more frequent in co-existing
anatomic variations of EMS than in Haller cells. In the analysis of
unilateral EMS patients, the EMS side significantly reduced the
maxillary sinus volume compared to the opposite side, whereas in the
Haller cell, the difference was not significant. There were no
significant relations between EMS or Haller cell and sinusitis. °á·Ð:EMS needs to be distinguished from Haller cells. Accurate confirmation
of EMS is the key to complete ventilation opening and removing of
pathologic lesions in the maxillary sinus. |