YONG JUN JEONG, MUN SOO HAN, MIN KYU LEE, SEUNG BIN PARK, KUK JIN NAM, KANG HYEON LIM, YOUNG SOO CHANG, YOON CHAN RAH, JUNE CHOI |
¸ñÀû: Pathophysiology of tinnitus has not been precisely established until now.
¡°Hidden hearing loss¡± with cochlear synaptopathy(CS) was suggested as a
potential pathophysiology of tinnitus with normal hearing threshold.
Several studies have demonstrated that subjects with tinnitus and normal
audiograms show significantly reduced auditory brainstem response (ABR)
wave I amplitudes compared with control subjects, but normal or increased
wave V amplitudes, suggesting increased central auditory gain. To our
knowledge, little studies of ABR change along duration of tinnitus have
been reported. We aimed to research about the ¡°hidden hearing loss¡±
theory along the duration. ¹æ¹ý:In the current study, 84 subjects (31 males, 53 females) who had unilateral
tinnitus with normal hearing were included between Jan. 2016 and Oct. 2017.
The amplitude of wave I and V, The latency of wave I, III, V were checked at
90dB nHL. Inter-peak latency (IPL) was calculated between wave I and III,
wave I and V, wave III and V, respectively. The ratio of amplitude of wave V
and I was calculated also. Those data was compared between Tinnitus ear(TEs,
Ipsi-lesion) and Non-tinnitus ear(NTEs, Contra-lesion). °á°ú:The within-subject comparison between TEs and NTEs showed no significant
differences in amplitude of wave I and wave V, wave V/I ratio, or latency of
wave I, III, V, and IPLs along the duration(acute, subacute, chronic). All
other data were not statistically significant, but latency of wave III of
TEs are longer than NTEs in acute group. °á·Ð:Our ABR data represent do not meaningful evidence supporting the hypothesis
of cochlear synaptopathy with increased central gain in tinnitus subjects
with normal audiograms. More subjects are needed. |